Now first off, I'm the last one who would call for private industry to continue to suck on a government tit. Right now our federal deficit is in the trillions and past presidential administrations have allowed the financial industry to run around like unsupervised kindergarteners, only resulting in the Fed loosening and whipping out a boob and squirting $700 billion worth of breast milk into the waiting mouths of the banking business.
But that left only one more boob for another brat: Big Auto, a set of siamese triplets that is just as demanding and hungry as big banking. A decade and a half ago, things were good for this industry, with its SUVs and minivans, which an America that continued to live well above its means screamed for. ...
At the time, everybody in Detroit ate good every night. The plants couldn't hire people fast enough and some people even quit their jobs at which a degree was a prerequisite to go work on the line, which paid better. The 90s made it seem like there was no turning back not just for the city, but for the whole northern I-75 corridor.
But that was then, this is now.
Over the course of the last eight years, plants laying off workers and closing up led to layoffs and closings and nasty strikes at first, second and third tier auto suppliers. Meanwhile Michigan's economy has been anemic, and is now dying like a weed that can't get water.
Divestment, a poor educational system, and a really stupid political scandal that affected not only Detroit, but the entire state did not help matters at all, but that is nothing compared to what will happen if the auto companies do not get help fast.
About 1 in 8 jobs in America is tied somehow to the auto industry. This means every auto plant job creates, in some way, another seven jobs. If any one of these companies dies, the effect will be felt immediately in Detroit as well as in communities along I-96, US-27, I-94 and I-75 stretching from Gary, Indiana to Saginaw, to Toledo, Dayton and Cincinnati, Ohio and even Windsor, Ontario.
Here's the immediate result of no bailout in Detroit, then elsewhere:
- *The drying up of operating capital will lead to massive fallout at all three companies. Bankruptcy restructuring is not likely to help because it will require getting more credit that is all but impossible to get at this point in time.
- *Auto plants, and immediately, their suppliers will shut down offering no buyouts, no packages. Salaries, wages and benefits will disappear for white collars, blue collars and retirees.
- *Individual savings accounts will dry up at banks leaving many both penniless and homeless.
- *Workers will not be able to purchase things at retail stores, which will eventually have to lay people off for lack of business.
- *More defaulting on mortgages and other bank loans will result in further meltdown of local, then regional financial institutions.
- *Inability to pay bills will deplete the tax base of municipal governments, sending whole cities into state receivership.
- *Property in and around Detroit, much of which is already selling for half of what it sold for two years ago, will be dilapidated and areas will become blighted, which invites squatting of the new, increasing homeless as well as all types of criminal activity.
- *Speaking of which, a black market economy that relies on drugs, prostitution, theft, graft and racketeering will replace a traditional one in communities that were once considered middle class.
- *Hospital emergency rooms will become inundated with people seeking care, because they do not have health insurance to go to a doctor regularly. Eventually they will close for lack of funds.
- *With no money for infrastructure repair, roads will become virtually impassible, daunting those who do have jobs from getting to work.
- *Claims for welfare, AFDC, and food stamps will skyrocket, leaving millions to rely on government aid just to survive.
- *No manufacturing in the region will mean the absence of trucking and shipping to other parts of the country. With no goods delivered, firms will have to rely more and more on imports, which will cost more because many must be brought in from other parts of the world, eventually bankrupting businesses who can't pay loans because of the high cost of importing.
- *Hence, the suffering will eventually spread to other regions and will serve as a precursor to a lengthy economic downturn from coast to coast lasting at least ten years.
- *If it lasts, it will eventually overshadow the Great Depression in its severity.
- *Finally, with no banks to lend funds, no manufacturing, nothing to trade and a sickly population, unable to work, the nation could face imminent collapse and with so many mouths to feed, and so few real survival skills, America goes from shining beacon of industry and freedom to third world cesspool.
Believe me, I'm hardly trying to be Chicken Little here, and I sincerely hope none of this comes to pass. But my point here is a thousand square mile swath of land depends on the survival of this industry. If it goes, so may the rest of us. I am also not suggesting that companies get bailed out every time they get in trouble.
However, desperate times call for desperate measures. $25 billion is a drop in the bucket compared to what it will cost to try to save a nation with a faint heartbeat and a comatose economy.
More From AOL Money
+ CEOs Flew Private Jets to Ask for Bailout
+ Lawmakers Agree on Aid to Automakers



Comments: (6)
Add a comment
By: Virgil Bierschwale on 11/21/2008 3:40PM
There is an alternative and that is for us to put all of the people whose jobs have been offshored back to work.
Then they would have the money to start buying things again which would mean that our retailers, manufacturers and raw material producers would start hiring again.
I have a "Wall of Shame" at http://www.KeepAmericaAtWork.com where I am adding the names of the CEO's and companies that are responsible for putting all of us out of work and creating this global financial crisis and I would like to add more names so that we know who we are dealing with, so please send me your links and names.
Thanks,
Virgil
http://www.KeepAmericaAtWork.com
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Greg Phillips on 11/23/2008 8:45AM
As much as I dislike the CEO's of the Big Three sadly the government must bail them out based on the aforemention reasons cited in the article.Hopefully these Harvard MBA's will wake up and get it right this time.They should have learned from the oil problems of the '70's.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Ben N on 11/25/2008 9:54AM
Your logic on this matter just doesn't make logical sense on a lot of things. Just because 1/8 of jobs somehow involve the auto industry does not mean that all of those jobs strictly depend on it. Even a significant number of employees of auto makers could readily find new jobs (it's tough to be an out of work engineer these days, etc). With that said, failure of the big auto companies would completely depress Detroit and much of the surrounding area as they have done little to diversify the economy there.
On the other hand, a bailout will not solve these issues. American car companies are doing two things: 1. Making uncompetitive cars; 2. Making too many of them. Yes, 25 billion is actually not that much in the grand scheme of things. But that is like saying that giving a drug addict friend 100 bucks is not a lot of money. You know it's going to be spent on bad things, so you don't.
Also, again- 25 billion is not that much money. Ford lost 12.6 billion alone in 2006, and it is the BEST performing of the three. Part of that reason is that they actually spent some of that 12 billion loss on better car design. I see no reason why the tax payers should have to give a handout here. To be honest, even if one of the big three completely shut down- their useful factories (i.e. the modern ones that can make money) will be liquidated by international automakers who will produce cars as "made in the USA." All the Japanese auto makers ALREADY do this to meet their level of demand within the US. So probably 1/3 of auto making jobs will have a lateral move to international auto makers, probably with lower pay and benefits(due to the glut of labor from the plant shut downs). If the Big Three had started downsizing earlier and reduced car production, this process would have already started happening.
The big issue is not a money issue. Good companies MAKE money. This is not a complicated process. Moreover, good companies get CREDIT (as Ford has already done by mortgaging logos and etc) if they need quick cash. If these were companies that showed any prospect of turning things around and making cash, private investment would be stepping in. They are bad risks. They have been bad risks for years.
They have been bad risks because they have not invested in better car design, but instead on marketing. I cannot count how many GM truck and SUV commercials I have seen over the last few years. I can however make a pretty accurate record of the innovations they have been putting into standard cars, as it's next to none. Their fuel economy has been awful and stagnant for nearly 20 years (barring cars like the Prizm that they rebrand from the Japanese), their safety statistics are mediocre, their maintenance track records are subpar, and their features are weak. Places like Japan are putting GPS systems in standard compact models, have a 5-10 year lead on efficient engine systems, and are building cars within the US. Even Korea, which has hit the market late, has been taking good market share in the US simply by imitating other effective car makers.
If US companies cannot create cars that dominate the Korean producers like Kia, I am simply at a loss as to why they should survive. US companies have implicit advantages of selling to the US population, due to nationalism (common in most markets) and a lack of import costs. Yet they still have dwindling market share. Shouldn't this raise warning flags about giving them money that just offsets the last two years of losses?
Simply put, there is no way the government should bail out the car companies. If they could actually put together long term business plans about building competitive cars, they could easily get 8 billion dollars apiece in credit. That is the free market. It's not like these are unknown companies that have trouble getting capital. They are big names that have been milking their logos rather than innovating. You can't reward that.
I would rather see 25 billion dollars in bail outs for welfare and public works projects that utilize the skills of car makers rather than give them money to keep doing the same old thing. I'd rather see 25 billion paying the same employees to retrain and build light rail than build massive quantities of unsellable cars.
Moreover, keep up with the news. Ford doesn't even need the money (though they'll certainly take it). They have been working on a plan called "The Way Forward" since 2005 and have actually posted one quarterly profit in the last few years (more than its competitors). They plan to be profitable by 2009 (so maybe a couple years after that, but still...) and are not having credit problems. Bail outs are not the answer, they just postpone the inevitable.
If I had 25 billion to play with, I'd offer subsidized retraining for auto employees worried about their future. It builds skills for the modern workplace, is relatively cheap in the long term, and gives a safety net in case of layoffs as people have skills for new careers. The auto companies won't collapse this year or next year, if at all. They're just likely to reduce production and lay people off. Building new skills in the couple years up til then would allow some of the laid off people to get new jobs. Some govt incentives and grants for entrepreneurship could generate more jobs for those people in (gasp) the Detroit area. I know they're not car jobs, but shucks, they're jobs in companies that have yet to post losses for 10 years running.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: lovly2008 on 11/28/2008 8:55PM
I think this is all a bunch of hogwash. Why is it that as soon as Obama seemed to be winning the Presidency, all the sudden all these companies are broke and need the government to rescue them. These people make billions of dollars to run these companies, they cant possibly be that stupid.
No, I think this is a Republican scheme to bankrupt the government so that Obama cannot do what he set out to do and hopefully get the Republicans back in office. We've already seen their policies and nothing is too low for them. These CEO's need to be throughly investigated.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Ed Bernard on 12/01/2008 10:19AM
I am a former Detroiter who has been forced to leave to go elsewhere in search of a job. Everyone needs to face some cold hard facts about the auto indistry in Detroit.The problem is not the auto industry. Most of the problems in Detroit and it's Metropolitan area have to do with the state not making a concerted and real effort to diversify the economy of the region and the state to create new jobs in industries outside of the auto industry. The auto industry and its state lobbyists have government officials in their back pocket and before any decisions can be reached they must first heck with their benefactors to see how it will impact the big three. It is nothing short of collusion for the betterment of the corporations. They could care less about the people in Detroit or the state. They only care about themselves and the company they represent.To give an example there should have been a mass transit system in and around Detroit a long time ago. The Auto makers made sure that did not happen because if you had good mass transit,bus, and rail service then less people would buy cars. The end result is grid lock every morning and every night.Government has not done anything to entice new business to come to Michigan. The school system is bad,public transportation is awful to non existent,taxes are high,and housing is in shambles.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Grant on 12/09/2008 1:46PM
Worried about Detroit...
Reply to this Comment | Report This