"Good Hair" is a film that seems to be right up Rock's alley, as he has gained a great deal of trust among his target audience. Most of us know better than to touch a black woman's hair, but Chris can run his fingers through it, and women don't seem to mind. The biggest question I have right now as a Finance Professor is "Did the film do well at the box office or are we just being delusional?"
BET seems to feel that "Good Hair" was an overwhelming success. Sure, this has nothing to do with the fact that Nelson George, the producer of the film, has close ties with BET. BET's bloggers also mention that the film may have earned only $1 million dollars (Chicken change by Hollywood standards), but it was only shown in 186 theaters in its opening weekend.
OK, good points, sort of. According to the site Box Office Mojo, the film is now showing in 466 theaters, with the total gross rising to roughly $2.8 million dollars. The revenue per theater, $2,030, is mediocre at best. The number is not in the top 20 of the films listed for the weekend of October 23rd. The previous weekend, the film earned $2,239 per theater. Is that a lot of money? Well, it depends on how much they paid to make the film - that data has been pretty tough to find.
Are the overall box office numbers for "Good Hair" any good? Well, it might be enough money to get your hair and nails done, but hardly enough to impress Hollywood executives. But the broader point is the fact that the film is a documentary, and documentaries are not designed to make blockbuster money. That's like comparing a plow mule to a race horse.
The film does provide the social benefit of getting all of us to think about why we do what we do. It also leads us to contemplate the status of the haircare industry: a place where black folks love to put their money, but also an industry that has very little African American ownership. It is for that reason I am supporting the boycott of non-black haircare providers held by Devin Robinson from November 16 - November 22.
Overall, it appears that "Good Hair" is a good project. Chris could have made a film that had us laughing, singing, or shaking our butts. Instead, he grabbed us by the brain and gave us knowledge. I can respect that.
Dr. Boyce Watkins is a Finance Professor at Syracuse University and author of the book, "Black American Money." To have Dr. Boyce commentary delivered to your email, please click here. 

Comments: (5)
Add a comment
By: CLee on 10/27/2009 6:16PM
I can't lie - I hate to sound like Negative Nancy, but I'm tired of people downing Chris Rock for doing "Good Hair". Yeah, you have him props in the LAST SENTENCE of your article, but the rest of your article was leaning on the shady side of the street. "Hair" cost $3 million to make and is a DOCUMENTARY that didn't go into wide release until this past Friday. As an African American woman(with NO ties to this film), I'm aggravated with BLACK PEOPLE who have been overcritical of a film that they haven't even seen!! Strange enough, if he would've done a film where he highlighted women wearing weaves and declared it the only acceptable standard of beauty, no one would've said a word! I applaud him for taking the stand and saying what he felt, along with giving those who weave a look at where that hair REALLY comes from! Do I weave? no. I don't down people who do either. What I want people to see is how the pool of beauty ripples out across the world, and I think Rock achieved that with "Good Hair"
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Debra on 10/28/2009 9:27PM
I think that Chris Rock should have left the film regarding Black women's hair alone. Every body in the world have something about their hair they don't like, it's not just Black women etc. What is the big deal. It also shows what people of other races think about our hair in the first place (negative). Weaves have been around since old Hollywood, only white actresses wore weaves for instance in Gun Smoke etc, now it is main stream. To me all he did was tell Black people business. Madame C.J. Walker did not invent the straighten comb, White people did, but she figured out if they could use it so could we, because White people don't like their hair curly, and some Black women like their hair straight, what's the point. It was a waste of time and money.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: aron ranen on 11/01/2009 5:39PM
Please take a moment to check out my documentary film BLACK HAIR
It is free at youtube. 6 parts including an update from London, England.
It explores the Korean Take-over of the Black Beauty Supply and Hair biz..
The current situation makes it hard to believe that Madame C.J. Walker once ran the whole thing.
I am not a hater, I am a motivator.
Plus I am a White guy who stumbled upon this, and felt it was so wrong I had to make a film about it.
self-funded film, made from the heart.
Can it be taken back?
Link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p96aaTSdrAE
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Leesa Travis on 11/04/2009 2:43AM
1) I have locks and I love my hair. Why didn't he show Black women who love their Natural hair ( my hair is long too)
2) Why didn't he address the issue Black Men have with Black Womens hair, Black Women have issues with their hair stemming from Black mens with issues about our hair. Their self hatred has trickled down to us.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: JennT on 11/06/2009 10:44PM
I have yet to see this film, but did catch Chris on Oprah promoting it and showing clips. I agree with Leesa on both points. When on Oprah, Chris said that Black men didn't care about hair, and that this obsession Black women have with fake hair is, in essence, due to our own vanity. This is untrue.
I am fair complexioned with Type 4B (extra, extra, hard core nappy) hair, which I have still in its natural state. When I wear my fro, Black men do not even make eye contact me. Some have even looked away, seemingly in embarrassment. Now, when I wear straight hair wigs, they are all over me. And, no, I do not act differently in straight hair than I do in my fro. Black men have an obsession with non-African textured hair that goes way back. The 'good hair' sisters would always be pursued hardest. The babies they'd produce with these women would be shown off all over the neighborhood and to their families. The little fuzzy haired babies fathered with nappy sisters? It was a toss up.
I've lived down South, Brooklyn, Upper East Side NYC, Los Angeles, Paris France and London England (West End and East End). I've spent considerable time in the German hinterlands and parts of Canada. I've traveled for short spans all over New England and every Southern state. No matter where I was, when I encountered Black men, even non-American ones, the hair thing held true: Nappy? Get gone. Straight hair? It's on!! Were our Black men more apt to celebrate our natural beauty, Sisters would feel more comfortable cultivating and displaying it! I plan to see the film. As soon as it's out on DVD, I'll pick out my mighty crown of knots and head down to Blockbuster’s.
Reply to this Comment | Report This