Wife Wins $9 Million From Mistress: Law Can't Keep Cheaters from Cheating...

Comments (2)

A North Carolina woman recently won $9 million in damages from the mistress that her husband had a long-term affair with. The damages were awarded based on "alienation of affections," a law that only exists in North Carolina and a handful of other states. The damages were based on the mistresses' interfering in the couple's marriage, in addition to the "severe emotional distress" the wife was subjected to upon discovery of the affair.

For many who already think that this country is litigation crazy, this case will likely end up being cited right along with the McDonald's hot coffee case to prove that point. However, that would not be a fair assessment of this ruling. Claims for emotional distress can take a variety of forms, and often are deserving of a monetary award for damages. Although the damage is not visible like with a physical injury, emotional distress can have a long-lasting negative impact on the person injured. If an individual can win an emotional distress claim for being harassed, or stalked, or simply observing something traumatic, then it seems reasonable that they may be compensated for the emotional distress stemming from being cheated on by their husband or wife. Though it can be debated whether $9 million is a reasonable amount, the reality is that this woman will likely see very little of that award. This decision was more a statement of what the jury thought of the mistress and her knowing participation in helping to potentially destroy a marriage (I say potentially because though the couple is separated, they have not finalized the divorce yet according to the report).


The most obvious issue with this award is with who wasn't sued. The mistress, although wrong, had made no commitment or taken any vows to be faithful to anyone; the husband did. Yet, the law only addresses the man or woman who comes from outside the marriage to participate in the affair. This tends to support the argument of some that the law is antiquated and out of touch with current times, in that it paints a picture of a happily married couple that is preyed upon by some random, immoral person who manipulates the husband or wife into an act of adultery. I don't know if that was ever the case, but it's definitely not the reality in most cases today. The North Carolina law makes more sense if applied equally to the cheating spouse, who is not a 'victim' by any stretch of the imagination.

The root issue of this case and the award given is the increasing frustration that many have with the lack of respect for marriage/committed relationships, and the ease with which many people will cheat on their significant other, in addition to the general tolerance of such behavior. Most states are not like North Carolina, where you can sue the person who your spouse has an affair with, and that is unlikely to change. This is a moral issue, and court ordered punishments will have little impact on changing the morals or values of anyone.

The $9 million award this wife received is good for her; however extramarital cheating is unlikely to go down because of it, even in North Carolina.

Comments: (1)

Add a comment

Page 1 of 1

Add a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed but they are required to confirm your comments. When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password."

Most Commented Articles

Daily Drama

The Best Clips From TV's Hottest Shows


More Daily Drama >>

Find a Message Board

Discover conversations on everyone from Barack to Beyonce. There are nearly 50 forums, so click on a category below and find the right one for you.