
I like NAACP President Ben Jealous. Being the youngest person to ever lead the 100-year old civil rights organization, Ben brings the fresh leadership necessary to make the organization what it should have been a long time ago, or at least what it used to be in the middle of the 20th century. Since that time, the NAACP has lost its relevance among young people, due to a perception that the organization may no longer be truly committed to engaging in the difficult fights necessary to advance the struggle toward civil rights in America.
Since its founding, the NAACP has had to dance the tight rope between progressive grassroots activism and the shackles of corporate cronyism. The group is on the receiving end of millions in corporate money, some of which comes with the subtle expectation that the watchdog group will spend its time watching somebody else. That doesn't mean that the deals are unethical, but given that money is a drug, we must be mindful of the fact that such addictions might come with consequences.
I wrote a bit on BV this week about the disturbing relationship between the NAACP and accused predatory lender Wells Fargo. My contention was not to imply that the NAACP was selling itself out, but rather, to argue that the words of the day must be "transparency" and "accountability" to ensure that the donation to the organization was not a ticket to wash away corporate sins. Wells Fargo has been accused by a long list of municipalities of egregious and highly destructive economic conduct within the African American community, and we simply cannot just "let bygones be bygones." Jealous wrote a response to public criticism on TheGrio.com, explaining the nature of the partnership and why the NAACP made its decision.
I spoke with Ben Jealous about the situation, and I found him to be very forthcoming and honest about the nature of the transaction. While I am not at liberty to discuss the details of the conversation, I can say that I did encourage him to be equally forthcoming with the African American community and those the NAACP represents. My discussion with Jealous was more productive, frank and enlightening than prior discussions I'd had with other members of the NAACP communications team. In fact, I was shocked that it took so long to get someone to call me back, and my poor assistant was banging her head against the wall for weeks.
At the end of the day, here are the issues that Ben Jealous and the NAACP must confront:
1) There is an image problem with being affiliated with Wells Fargo: If I were to allow the neighborhood child molester to move into the bedroom next to my kids, my wife had better get a pretty good explanation. The point is that any civil rights group working with a company like Wells Fargo had better explain away the stigma very clearly and very quickly. If you do not, people are going to jump to conclusions. I would love to see the NAACP release information and contractual terms to explain the nature of their lawsuit against Wells Fargo and how the terms of the suit were satisfied. If they REALLY want to be open with the public, they would even reveal how much money Wells Fargo is giving to the organization.
2) We must all continue to be concerned with what happens from this point forward: The NAACP's lawsuit was based on dealing with present and future behavior on the part of Wells Fargo, which is certainly a meaningful contribution. But it is also my hope that none of us forgets that much of the damage done by Wells Fargo occurred in the past. These damages must be remedied, since it doesn't make sense to be punished for a crime by simply having to promise not to commit the crime anymore. Wells Fargo has profited from the African American community to the tune of several billion dollars, and I am not interested in seeing this company let off the hook so easily. I don't accuse the NAACP of letting them off the hook, but I am hopeful that additional calls for accountability will be forthcoming. There's an old woman somewhere without a home because of Wells Fargo's actions in the past. We need to help her too.
At the end of the day, I learned a little bit more about the NAACP and they learned a little bit more about me. I plan to continue to communicate with their leadership in hopes that we can all have an understanding of how they plan to monitor Wells Fargo and other banks that are making loans to African Americans. If the organization does half of what I've been told that they plan to do in this settlement, then the world will be better off. Let's see how this one goes.
Dr. Boyce Watkins is the founder of the Your Black World Coalition and the author of the new book, "Black American Money." To have Dr. Boyce commentary delivered to your email, please click here. 
Comments: (9)
Add a comment
By: Sweetneke on 5/01/2010 1:49PM
The NAACP still sold out the blk community and I will never support another black organization
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: meanvee on 5/01/2010 7:18PM
Instead of taking a donation from wells fargo, the NAACP should of demanded that wells fargo compensate those people that where hurt from their predatory lending ways, those are the people they need to make good with.
http://www.GetPaydayDirect.com
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: EyesofTexas on 5/01/2010 9:16PM
UNACCEPTABLE NAACP!!! These groups must remember the long term, generational damage that they have perpetuated. There is no amount of money that can restore all of the displaced families. Why would the terms of the settlement even be under lock and key. WF actively sought out and pursued these people knowing the consequences....so why would the NAACP make this kind of a deal and then NOT tell the people they serve. Absolutely we want fair, equitable solutions BUT unless we are willing to tell people the "traps" we can expect that all of this WILL happen again. Stay the course Dr.B!
Read my new release:
YES YOU CAN EDIT YOUR CREDIT!
http://www.authorhouse.com/Bookstore/ItemDetail.aspx?bookid=62808
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: ADRIAN HARRIS OF SOUTH GEORGIA GO!!! GRAMBLING!!!! GO!!!! on 5/01/2010 10:16PM
OH WELL, LIKE A SONG I USED TO TRY TO UNDERSTAND BECAUSE OF THE STATIC. I'S A ROCK SONG. WE ALL NO THAT AFRICAN AMERICA INVENTED ROCK. "BACK WERE WE STARTED, HERE WE GO ROUND AGAIN." THAT PART I COULD HERE. PEACE.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Deanna Jameson on 5/02/2010 11:03AM
I find this to be very disturbing. Wells Fargo rips off the Black community, the NAACP shakes them down, and now they won't disclose the agreement? NO SIR! That will not fly. Even if the NAACP doesn't want to disclose the agreement to the public, the few members that they have left, has a right to know what they did. What's the big secret they are hiding?
Ben Jealous is not the new leadership the NAACP needs. He is more of the status quo and a fundraiser. Under Jealous' term so far, we have this shady Wells Fargo deal and the NAACP's endorsement of net neutrality (another means for the NAACP to add money to their coffers while selling us out).
When Bruce Gordon resigned, I knew it was time for the NAACP to fold. They are NOT interested in representing the Black community, only their bank accounts.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: tom on 5/02/2010 2:01PM
REMEMBER BUSH SAID STOP ALL IN DC SAID IF IT ANT BROKE DONT FIX IT
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Aquil on 5/04/2010 10:59PM
> I support MIN.FARRAKHAN call for REPARATIONS &
SEPARATION > This will be done void of color >
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Rick on 5/04/2010 11:10PM
I'm sorry Dr.Wakins but I have to disagree with you this time. There's no way the NAACP can settle with wells fargo and not release the agreement. That is just unheard of. Anyone of those directors that agreed to the settlement I bet you was not hurt like the average black family have been hurt by them.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: JackBP on 5/06/2010 3:02PM
If taking money from Wells Fargo is all that bad;what is taking money for promoting Allstate Insurance Co.? They are as bad; if not worse when it comes to policies?. I'm not endorsing Wells Fargo by any means, but what corporation is trust able?.
Reply to this Comment | Report This