
"It is not intended, but it's the result of patterns that perpetuate forms of discrimination," according to Ted Landsmark, President of Boston Architectural College, who headed the panel.
The evaluation occurred after the tenure denial of Pierre Desir, a black scholar in the field of Communication arts. His denial occurred at the same time as Roger House, another black male professor at the college. The local NAACP got involved in their cases, and asked for an independent review of the practices at the college.
In 129 years, Emerson granted tenure to just three black scholars, with two of them having to sue in order to obtain the position. What is saddest is that this is a common theme around the country. One example would be the hiring practices of Elena Kagan, the recent nominee to the Supreme Court. Out of 29 tenured or tenure track hires at the Harvard Law School (where Kagan was dean), 28 of those hires under Kagan's watch happened to be white. Kagan is not alone in her racial bias, since most predominantly white universities accept equally egregious and unintelligent outcomes (except, of course, during basketball season).
One finding of the report on Emerson College, which serves as a microcosm of what happens all across America, is that most African American tenure track faculty are vulnerable because "their energy and sense of belonging are being taxed." The report also cites the "unintended bias" of non-black faculty, who end up concluding that black scholarship is not as valuable as the work produced by white scholars (one example is when Cornel West had the quality of his work questioned by an inferior scholar, Lawrence Summers, formerly the President of Harvard University). The cases are even more dramatic and racially-biased in the sciences and business schools, many of whom have never tenured or even hired an African American faculty member in over 100 years of existence. All the while, hundreds of white men are given the opportunity.
One of the other interesting findings of the Emerson report is that it revealed a "lack of understanding" of historical discrimination of minorities and how many faculty members inadvertently contribute to the perpetuation of these patterns. "It's not a matter of George Wallace standing at the door saying no entry," one panelist said. "But it's the same result."
Please allow me to break it down and make it simple. You see, academic institutions are like any other institution, physical or social, with constructs created from actions and choices of the past. Therefore, perceptions and outcomes of the present exist within the confines of structural limitations that were contrived and executed at some point in the institution's history. Many universities across America were founded on the premise of an undeniable, unquestionable, prolonged and deep commitment to racial inequality: Black people weren't hired and black students were refused admission. By virtue of the fact that many institutions are reluctant to change and that they also hold onto norms and traditions established long ago, administrators who continue to promote such practices become inadvertent accomplices to modern day inequality. Jim Crow is alive and well in academia, and many of our most highly-educated citizens are behaving like narrow-minded members of the Ku Klux Klan.
As a bachelors, masters and doctoral student, I never once had a single black professor in any of my classes. This made my educational experience uncomfortable, and unnecessarily dramatic. In spite of the fact that I studied as much as 10 hours a day, 7 days a week, I found myself involved in racialized political battles that threatened to keep me from ever earning my doctorate. During my time at The Ohio State University Business School, my entire academic career was nearly derailed by a rogue professor in an incident in which I simply stood up against the racism of one of her Stanford colleagues. It was the presence of a black scholar in another department (the only black faculty member ever tenured in the entire history of the business school at the time) that saved my career. That's the difference that a black faculty member can make – black students need mentors too.
Here is one solution to the silliness of academia that many have simply decided to accept: Hold universities accountable for their numbers. If a department has never tenured a single African American in more than 50 years, they should be subject to investigation and expected to answer for their racially-biased hiring practices. If they claim they can't find qualified minorities, then they should be assisted in their job search. If they claim that all minorities they've encountered are not good enough to be hired, then their hiring practices should be monitored and evaluated by an independent entity. At the end of the day, academic honesty must be upheld by asking institutions to answer the difficult questions and not simply avoid them.
Universities are among the most racist institutions in America. There are some who believe that certain forms of elitism preclude select citizens from the same standards of fairness that we must all profess to as Americans. Universities that are uncommitted to producing fairness and equity in their ranks should be unconditionally rejected by us all. Our children, who will lead the future, should not be learning from individuals and institutions that are so readily committed to maintaining the norms of the past.
Dr. Boyce Watkins is the founder of the Your Black World Coalition and a Scholarship in Action Resident of the Institute for Black Public Policy. To have Dr. Boyce commentary delivered to your email, please click here. 
Comments: (15)
Add a comment
By: C on 7/01/2010 11:45AM
Shame! Shame! Shame! another reason why my children attend HBCUs.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Shawn on 7/01/2010 12:53PM
I loved this article. I myself faced racism at the age of 21 (I'm 24 lol) and I was in an office where everyone was white. They didn't like me because I was in a white male dominant field. Who is this young black girl & who does she think she is? How is it possible she graduated college? She can't be smart she didn't go to UGA! She can't be fluent on the computer she's black! She's this, that, and everything negative. They tried to get me fired and another black woman saved my career before it ended. So the ideal of black mentors is important in school and in a professional environment. I was sooo young at the time. A month out of college. I was awaken and I've been woke ever since. Great article!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: fsilber on 7/01/2010 1:35PM
"Universities are among the most racist institutions in America."
And yet, they're run almost entirely by Democrats.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: manolo on 7/02/2010 11:06AM
as if black people don't know that both mainstream democrats and mainstream republicans are racists...
you suggesting that if universities were run by "republicans" they would be less racist? ... ja
Report This
By: Joe on 7/02/2010 4:11PM
...Cornell West is a 'superior scholar'?
I see a lot of merit in most of what you wrote, but that threw me for a loop.
As best I can tell, Larry Summers totally went after the guy with kid gloves for not producing serious scholarship like a tenured Harvard faculty member should, and West's leaving Harvard wasn't Harvard's loss.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Malaika on 7/02/2010 1:17AM
Clearly, you don't know what you are talking about. Wow...
Report This
By: Keith on 7/01/2010 5:01PM
Despite the fact that this commentary is based on a study, it is remarkably abstract, lacking in concrete examples from the data. Part of that is space and part of that is confidentiality. But I would like more substance before I take the example of one College and one columnist's experience as exemplary of an entire nation of schools. When we criticize racism, we need to do better than this. At least provide a link to the Emerson College study!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: TD on 7/01/2010 5:54PM
All the hiring committees I've ever been involved with--close to a dozen--are almost comically desperate to get black faculty. In one case, a woman with a C graduate average in chemistry from a third-tier school (in most grad schools, a "C average" is cause for dismissal) was offered a position. It was clear she was the worst candidate, and probably didn't belong in academia at all, having barely scraped through grad school. She was offered 20% more than the standard starting salary, which would have infuriated her colleagues if they ever found out. But...she had so many offers she didn't even bother to refuse my institution until after two weeks of frantic phone calls.
Now, for the most part, business and communications schools are troglodytic. But I don't think they're representative of most academic disciplines, especially those in the humanities and social sciences.
The fact is, there is a severe shortage of black Ph.D.s in this country...something like 3% of the total in all disciplines every year. Not all of these enter the academy, either. Only top-tier schools have a prayer of landing them, unless the candidate is so hopeless he doesn't realize this. And those candidates still get jobs. Add to the fact that most academics have no clue whatsoever about how to hire people of any color--for instance, they wouldn't dream of identifying promising candidates in their 3rd year of grad school and sweet-talking them, although this is standard for corporations--and you have a problem. Finally, what percentage of black scholars fail to get tenure overall? Is it more or less than white scholars? How does this break down by discipline (the biggest unexamined question here)? Right now, about 40% of the (white) pool at the GF's department are running the risk of not making tenure. This is because tenure is *hard*. And if there are so few black candidates to begin with, *any* tenure failures are going to loom larger than they should.
Racism, though? I'm going to have to disagree. I've seen too many people trying hard--arguably too hard--to make faculties more diverse no matter what. And I'm going to need more figures to change my mind, not this collection of anecdotes.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: manolo on 7/02/2010 10:13AM
All the hiring committees I've ever been involved with--close to a dozen--are almost comically desperate to get black faculty. In one case, a woman with a C graduate average in chemistry from a third-tier school (in most grad schools, a "C average" is cause for dismissal) was offered a position. It was clear she was the worst candidate, and probably didn't belong in academia at all, having barely scraped through grad school. She was offered 20% more than the standard starting salary, which would have infuriated her colleagues if they ever found out. But...she had so many offers she didn't even bother to refuse my institution until after two weeks of frantic phone calls.
right, because he was writing about hiring associate professors not TENURING professors, stay on point, you just invalidated half of your so-called argument.
another white liberal...
Report This
By: TD on 7/02/2010 11:32AM
@manolo--Do you mean hiring assistant professors? Because that's the rank you start with. Also, tenure creates an associate from an assistant.
I'm sorry if you didn't understand my entire argument. My point is that tenure failure cannot be looked at synchronically; it is diachronic. Given the degree of care and concern about faculty diversity I've personally witnessed at some great and some not-so-great places, I find it hard to believe that suddenly this turns into "But don't tenure them!" after seven years. Unless you're an Ivy League, denying tenure is something nobody wants to do. Rehiring someone is expensive, destroys your scholarly productivity for a term or more, and runs a real risk of pissing off your dean or president (!) at many places...especially if you've just denied the only minority member of your department.
Report This