I recently appeared on CNBC with my respected colleague
Dr. Christopher Metzler of Georgetown University. The point of discussion was the wealth distribution in America and whether the rich should pay more in taxes than the poor. While my
personal point of view was argued on the show, I wanted to hit this issue and explain why one could argue that it's not a sin for the rich to be taxed a bit more heavily here in the United States.
Most of the arguments for not increasing taxes on the rich usually go back to "trickle down economics." This argument is one in which we believe that by cutting taxes on the wealthy and corporations, we can stimulate business, create jobs and ultimately help the poor when the wealth trickles down to those at the bottom. The problem with trickle down economics is that it usually doesn't work. While some degree of business stimulation is certainly good for an economy, the fundamental assumptions of American capitalism argue that corporations should do what they can to keep the trickle from ever occurring: Labor unions should be undermined and wages should be minimized, all for the sake of making shareholders as wealthy as possible.
One of the problems in the United States is that over the past 20 years, 94 percent of the wealth created in this country went to the top 20 percent of Americans.
The top 1 percent of Americans sucked up 42 percent of our country's wealth. This clear imbalance of wealth makes the United States second to only Switzerland when it comes to having the worst wealth imbalance of any industrialized nation on earth. This is a threat to our national security, since wealth imbalances lead to internal conflict (at the very worst resulting in civil wars) and economic decay. Before long, we can end up in a situation similar to countries like Nigeria, where the middle class has become virtually nonexistent in spite of the country's vast oil reserves.
http://xml.channel.aol.com/xmlpublisher/fetch.v2.xml?option=expand_relative_urls&dataUrlNodes=uiConfig,feedConfig,entry&id=908885&pid=908884&uts=1278948828
http://cdn.channel.aol.com/cs_feed_v1_6/csfeedwrapper.swf
Lots of Tax Hikes Coming in 2011
Think Taxes Are Too High Now?
Just wait: Congress is all but certain to raise them a couple of years from now. Tax increases will hit both businesses and individuals -- and not just singles making more than $200,000 a year and married couples over $250,000 a year. They'll be the first to get pinched, but not the last. There's just not enough revenue that can be drawn from the wealthy without crippling the economy, so in time, middle incomers will feel a bigger bite, too.
Continue clicking through to see what's rising to the top of Kiplinger's list of probable hikes for individuals and businesses.
Getty Images
WireImage.com
BlackVoices.com
Lots of Tax Hikes Coming in 2011
Think Taxes Are Too High Now?
Just wait: Congress is all but certain to raise them a couple of years from now. Tax increases will hit both businesses and individuals -- and not just singles making more than $200,000 a year and married couples over $250,000 a year. They'll be the first to get pinched, but not the last. There's just not enough revenue that can be drawn from the wealthy without crippling the economy, so in time, middle incomers will feel a bigger bite, too.
Continue clicking through to see what's rising to the top of Kiplinger's list of probable hikes for individuals and businesses.
Lots of Tax Hikes Coming in 2011
Probable Hike for Individuals
Boosts in top marginal rates from 33% and 35% to 36% and 39.6%. No change in the other marginal rates seems likely.
Lots of Tax Hikes Coming in 2011
Probable Hike for Individuals
A higher rate on capital gains and dividends, but only for those in the top brackets. They will probably be hit with a 20% rate, though it could go a little higher.
Lots of Tax Hikes Coming in 2011
Probable Hike for Individuals
Caps on itemized deductions for top earners. Obama's push to limit the value of deductions at 28% ran into a wall of opposition from charitable groups, but he's not giving up. Some way of curtailing the tax break still seems likely by 2011.
Lots of Tax Hikes Coming in 2011
Probable Hike for Individuals
No repeal of estate taxes, but count on an exemption of at least $3.5 million, and it could be set as high as $5 million if the Senate prevails. Estate tax legislation will include spousal transfers, making the exemption $7 million or more for couples. The estate tax rate will be capped at 45%, the same as it is now.
Lots of Tax Hikes Coming in 2011
Probable Hike for Individuals
More easings for the alternative minimum tax, but no repeal.
What about businesses? Businesses can expect a mixed bag of hikes and cuts, but with a higher total tax bill. Click through to see some of the changes expected.
Lots of Tax Hikes Coming in 2011
Probable Hike for Businesses
Higher SECA taxes for owners of S firms and partnerships by blocking them in the future from skirting payroll taxes by taking their compensation as dividends instead of salary.
Lots of Tax Hikes Coming in 2011
Probable Hike for Businesses
New restrictions on worker classification to make it easier for the IRS to crack down on firms that treat workers as contractors who are really employees.
Lots of Tax Hikes Coming in 2011
Probable Hike for Businesses
An elimination of some tax breaks for big corporations, including the deduction for domestic production, accelerated depreciation and incentives for foreign income and oil production.
· Read the Full Article From Kiplinger
Like this? Continue clicking to see more popular galleries.
Lots of Tax Hikes Coming in 2011
Our nation's fiscal situation is only set to get worse, as our deficit has climbed the $13 trillion mark. Social Security is dying, and our national productivity is dropping just as fast. This means that over the next 30 years, our country is going to have fewer resources to handle more financial obligations and an aging population. So, while our nation suffers financially, one could argue that those who are spending money on private jets and $50,000 vacations should be taxed one or two percent more to help out with the high cost of running America. The poor could be asked to pay more taxes, too, if it weren't for the fact that the rich seem to hoard nearly all the country's wealth already.
Fair and equitable wealth distribution in the United States is an important part of our nation's economic survival. If we don't do this one the right way, we will find that our nation suffers more deeply because of it moving forward. There's nothing wrong with sharing your wealth, especially if it contributes to overall social stability.
Dr. Boyce Watkins is the founder of the Your Black World Coalition and a Scholarship in Action resident of the Institute for Black Public Policy. To have Dr. Boyce's commentary delivered to your e-mail, please click here.
Comments: (7)
Add a comment
By: Erica on 7/12/2010 3:42AM
I disagree. What is the point of working hard if you know that the gpovernment is going to heavily tax you to subsididze others? I understand giving a helping hand but it has turned into a fiasco of others working simply to pay for those who choose either through lifestyle, education, or "can't simply fit into one box" categories to not better themselves? Ambition will simply disappear.
"You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is about the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it."-- Dr. Adrian Rogers
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: charles on 7/13/2010 3:17AM
I agree with some of what you say but someone has to pay for police ,fire, the arm forces and other essential services .The money sure is not going to come from the poor . Behind close doors the rich are as surprise as anyone that they are not taxed more but they wont admit it .
Report This
By: meanvee on 7/12/2010 10:03AM
How about taxing those states that has no income tax like florida and nevada and whatever other state that don't pay income tax.
http://www.GetPaydayDirect.com - debt help also.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: sparky on 7/12/2010 6:20PM
also tax the one who earn their living and move to those state to avoid paying tax.
Report This
By: wendy on 7/13/2010 10:45AM
Of course the rich should pay more taxes! They make more money. Our country needs to focus on decreasing poverty in its own country.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: stare k on 7/13/2010 2:49PM
Yes the rich should pay more .
If I was rich I would give & give & give. The BIBLE SAY TO THE RICH TO SELL WHAT YOU HAVE AND GIVE IT TO THE POOR , YES GIVE IT TO THE POOR
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: aretha on 8/30/2010 1:05AM
Earning money online never been this easy and transparent. You would find great tips on how to make that dream amount every month. So go ahead and click here for more details and open floodgates to your online income. All the best.
Reply to this Comment | Report This