By Elliot Millner on Jul 26th 2010 3:13PM
Filed under: News

A group of black Southern California Edison (SCE) employees
recently filed a class action lawsuit against the company, alleging racial discrimination dating back to the '70s. The plaintiffs claim that SCE has routinely passed over black employees for promotion, and discriminates based on race in hiring. The plaintiffs also allege that they contend with a racially-hostile work environment, in addition to unequal pay and job assignments.
This is not the first time that SCE has been accused of racial discrimination, having faced discrimination class action suits in 1974 and 1994. Consent decrees from both lawsuits required the company to make "good faith efforts to increase the employee population and improve the opportunities for African-Americans ." However, as reported by
Southern California Public Radio, the numbers of black employees at SCE has decreased by approximately forty percent since the most recent suit in 1994.
Although we should not jump to conclusions or presume guilt based on previous behavior, the allegations made by the plaintiffs in the SCE class action suit are disturbing. If true, these allegations show a pattern of racial discrimination against black employees embedded so deeply in the culture of SCE that two previous lawsuits weren't enough to get the company to change its management style. It appears that SCE does not even want to make the slightest attempt at treating black employees fairly.
http://xml.channel.aol.com/xmlpublisher/fetch.v2.xml?option=expand_relative_urls&dataUrlNodes=uiConfig,feedConfig,entry&id=915498&pid=915497&uts=1280174528
http://cdn.channel.aol.com/cs_feed_v1_6/csfeedwrapper.swf
Best and Worst Company Names of All Time
A great company name has to captivate customers and explain what, exactly, the company does -- usually all in one word. Names can make or break a company, and Inc.com's list of the best and worst company names of all time is an eye-opener for aspiring entrepreneurs. Click forward to see why each of these names is an asset or a detriment.
Getty Images for NAACP
WireImage.com
BlackVoices.com
Best and Worst Company Names
A great company name has to captivate customers and explain what, exactly, the company does -- usually all in one word. Names can make or break a company, and Inc.com's list of the best and worst company names of all time is an eye-opener for aspiring entrepreneurs. Click forward to see why each of these names is an asset or a detriment.
Best and Worst Company Names
"Bookgoo, which is a site that allows you to highlight Web pages, sounds like something nasty that would make the pages of a dirty old library book stick together," says Christopher Johnson, a Seattle-based naming expert, who runs The Name Inspector blog. "The way the pronunciation gets 'stuck' between the k and g sounds strengthens this unfortunate association."
Best and Worst Company Names
"The name limits this company to being identified with a single category," says Phillip Davis, the founder of Tungsten Branding in Brevard, N.C. "But they sell books, music and magazines. As a result, they must market harder to overcome this."
Best and Worst Company Names
"Just try to say it three times fast," Davis says.
Best and Worst Company Names
"The truncated geographic descriptor name limits the company to one category in one country," Davis says. "If you're looking for a computer in the U.S., this is your place. But for a DVD player? Who knows?"
Best and Worst Company Names
"There's almost no point in even trying to understand where they're going with this," says Eli Altman, a brand strategist at One Hundred Monkeys, a naming firm in Mill Valley, Calif. "OK, so they do transportation in the air -- I get it. To just say exactly what you do, and say it in the most boring way possible, doesn't really help anyone involved."
Best and Worst Company Names
"Of course, this is definitely not a word, but it sounds like one," Altman says of the VOIP phone service. "The problem is there's no inherent property in this name. You hear it, and it's just kind of a passable word. It seems like the goal with a name like this is to go unnoticed. I would love to hear their explanation of what this has to do with who they are or what they're about."
Best and Worst Company Names
"It's not clear how to pronounce this name, but the most likely pronunciation is identical to the word "incubi", the plural of "incubus," the name for a demon from Medieval folklore that rapes women in their sleep," Johnson says of the online inventor community. "Have we learned nothing from the Reebok Incubus fiasco?" [In the 1990s, Reebok came out with a women's running shoe called Incubus.]
Best and Worst Company Names
"Co America? Is there another America that I don't know about it?" Altman says. "I guess this company could say that they work with America. America is never a word you should play with or add things on to. I think people have extraordinarily complex views of the word. They're playing with a very available and present word, and they did it in a careless way."
Best and Worst Company Names
"This great example of bad wordplay seems to combine two words with unhelpful meanings: "fertilizer" (meaning 'manure') and "fair" (meaning 'so-so')," Johnson says of the online music company. "The transition between the first two syllables is unnatural in English, so the eleven-year-old in all of us can't avoid seeing and hearing the name as Fartilizer."
Best and Worst Company Names
A story like this one should be like cold water in the face of those who want to deny that there is still racism in this country.
From the Shirley Sherrod firing, to the
NAACP resolution asking the Tea Party to address the racism in its membership, race issues are really coming to the forefront in America in a divisive way. Now we have
Senator Jim Webb of Virginia claiming that white privilege is a myth, and that affirmative action in all its forms should be disbanded. These events and more show how important it is that we remain aware of the racial reality in this country, no matter what people try to claim. The reality is that racial injustice still exists, regardless of the objections of ignorant people who want to ignore it.
Blacks and other non-whites still face systematic and ongoing discrimination such as what these black employees at Southern California Edison are claiming. Some black people have been scared into silence because they have been shamed by conservatives against "playing the race card." Yet, it would be the epitome of foolishness for black people to allow our attention to be distracted from the issues that significantly impact us by accepting the false arguments of those who have the most to gain from distorting reality.
I commend the employees of Southern California Edison for taking a stand in the midst of our culture of denial.
Comments: (2)
Add a comment
By: Mr. Stephen on 7/27/2010 9:43PM
Where is the NAACP, radio,TV,News, talk show host and other. when it comes to the little people loosing their job and befor loosing that job are treated unfairly, disrespected and who seek to get justice by the union, Humen relation, EEOC, and the justice system betrade them become they are not a known figure in society. I have written the President and the Attorney General about my case, but those work under them probally feel itts not important enougt to pass the information on to them. Because as of this very day after several letters certifiled. I have yet to recieve a communication back, so I guess you have to be someone of inportant! (wow I though I was( A vet, ) can I get a call! for some assistance with my issue. Please read the following letter!
US-Veteran Mr. Stephen. L
E-mail- Ilovebopping@aol.com
To President Obama The Commander & chief of the United State&
The Attorney General Of The United State,
Honorable Mr. Eric Holder
I have filed a law suite against all parties involved in my case employment discrimination and
mistreatment, The Delaware County Office Serving The Aging, Human Relation, Pennsylvania EEOC, and The Civil Service Commission, and International Brotherhood Teamsters Local Union 115, and must add Judge Baylson, Michael and the Pennsylvania state attorney Tom Corbett, and feel I might have to add more names. As this case goes on for added discrimination
,and farther unfair treatment because I am not a Lawyer.
I would like to bring the following situation to your attention. I find my civil rights being violated by
the following Judge Baylson, who constantly denials all of my request of important document to help
my case. A lawyer for the defendants Matthew J Connell of media Penn and the other defendants that
were dismissed by the judge. I have been fighting against work place injustice sine 2007 on my own
and was granted permission to represent myself by the US District court Judge Baylson. I have written
your office over the years, and sent letters and e-mails to the president as well about this matters,
and the degree of disrespect I get from all parties involved. I am being harassment by all parties who
have yet to give me any things I have requested pertaining to my case or any request I have made
under the freedom act of information.
Those defendants are located on the following pages located to the left of the legal form. Who have
all denailed me a right to a fair trail and witnesses to support my accusation, and the rights to
examining any evident agaist me.
Here are my issues!
1a). Pro se parties are expected to adhere to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and
the Local Rules of Civil Procedure and to file all of their pleadings with the Clerk of the Court, rather than directly with chambers. This is one of the judge’s rules, so why did I have to turn my paper work over to the opposing party @ their office?
1b) 7) Right to a Fair Trial , so where are my rights especially my civil rights that has been violated by the judge, the attorney general of the state of Pennsylvania, and the other defendants
(Every person has the right to a fair trial both in civil and in criminal cases, and the effective protection of all human rights very much depends on the practical availability at all times of access to competent, independent and impartial courts of law which can, and will, administer justice fairly.)
1c) TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 21 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 1981
Prev | Next
§ 1981. Equal rights under the law
How Current is This?
(a) Statement of equal rights
All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other.
(b) “Make and enforce contracts” defined
For purposes of this section, the term “make and enforce contracts” includes the making, performance, modification, and termination of contracts, and the enjoyment of all benefits, (privileges,) terms, and conditions of the contractual relationship. (The word privileges means that you are entitled to everything another person gets, so the question here is ” Why wasn’t I granted permission to subpoena key state witnesses or even get important document from these witnesses. Since I am acting as my own lawyer so where is the due process? )
(c) Protection against impairment
The rights protected by this section are protected against impairment by nongovernmental discrimination and impairment under color of State law.
(The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution limit the power of the federal and state governments to discriminate. The Fifth amendment has an explicit requirement that the federal government not deprive individuals of "life, liberty, or property," without due process of the law. See U.S. Const. amend. V. It also contains an implicit guarantee that each person receive equal protection of the laws. (The Fourteenth Amendment explicitly prohibits states from violating an individual's rights to due process and equal protection). See U.S. Const. amend. XIV. In the employment context, the right of equal protection limits the power of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their employment practices by treating employees, former employees, or job applicants unequally because of membership in a group (such as a race or sex). Due process protection requires that employees receive a fair process before the termination if the termination relates to a "liberty" (such as the right to free speech) or property interest. State constitutions may also afford protection from employment discrimination. )
The Constitution does not directly constrain discrimination in the private sector, but the private sector has become subject to a growing body of federal and state statutes.
1C) I partition the court to subpoena key state workers to court to testified about
their statements and actions, and was denied access to these people by the judge Baylson.
Who seemed to be protecting these state workers as well as the union.
2) Judge Baylson, dismissed my case without doing any checks and balances. Which resorted in giving
the major defendants the opportunity to have my case dismissed against them, but he had to reopening
the case. However the majority state defendants and the union were still granted permission for
dismissal because a mistake made on the court’s behalf.
3) I sent a letter to the judge under the freedom act of information for the defendants to appearance in
the court room and to make key documents available to me and was denied by the judge again.
4) I am now compelled to take my documents to the opposing lawyer, but yet when I request
something from the court I am denied, and the following statement continue to appear on my letter
from the court or judge “ I need to learn civil proceeding ,but yet he gave me permission to represent
myself, so why can’t I have all the privileges and resources a lawyer has to defend myself?
5) The last letter I received instruct me to take my document to the opposing lawyer office and give
them to them. However, I have informed the opposing lawyer and reminded the judge. Thoses
documents are in the court’s possession and available to all. Yet I continue to be harassed by both the
judge and the lawyer, and all of my request have been denied , and all the privileges a lawyer has have
not been extended to me acting as my own lawyer grant by the court to do so. I can’t see being forced
to go to the opposing lawyer’s office equal grounds of justice. I find it to be a disadvantage for me.
6) As of 3/10 I have learned that my case has been dismissed, so therefore I would like to bring charges
Against Judge Baylson for discrimination, unfair treatment, denialing my requests, and honoring a
freedom of information request, as well as playing sides and adding more stress. Ordering me to take
my documents to opposing defends lawyer ’s office. When the documents are available in the court
House.
I am asking for a congressional investigation into the violations of my civil rights to protect my rights
and myself. I have a right to have access to all available documents established by the defendants for
my review. To prepare myself for court and copies made available as well.
I have a right to have all involved in this case subpoena to court to prove my points, and to expose
the wrong doing at my last place of employment. To include all the errors the defendants have made.
I also would like my case to be heard by another judge. Who is going to be fair with the justice and
review all documents made available to them. Before favoring the other part because they have the
degree in law compared to my social worker degree.
I have read! When there are in fractions establish in a case and proof can be provided. A plaintiff
Can ask or have their case moved to the supreme court. To be heard by another judge according to
Their legal manuals, so please investigate as soon as possible. I need a judge who is going to stand up
For what’s right and not become apart of the other side. Because they are the state and I am just a
Veteran . Who tried to go back in the civilian work force , so the question is who here to protect my
rights?
When I have been protecting their and still have all the means and skills to continue to protect
American rights.
The following are emails and letters I have sent before this letter. My case number 08-4182, at the
United State District Court For The Eastern District Of Pennsylvania, for I am very tired of being play
with by people who think I do know anything.
Please read the following documents and investigate how this judge handled my case!
I would like to bring federal charge against all involved in my case and their associates for discrimination, unfair treatement, violation of my civil rights, withholding evidenets, ignoring my request, protecting felonies or their buddies, causing long term stress, and violating state, county, and federal rules that protects all american especially military veteran, and to conduct a proper investigation, and doing their jobs in the rightful manner
Sign Veteran Mr. Stephen
CC-President and other veterans organizations and others!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: donald l. eaton on 1/13/2011 1:57AM
I am a disable black vet. And I am receiving the same type of treatment you are receving. I'm sure there are many more in this country being treated as we are. We should form a club and have an attorney to represent us in these cased. United we have a chance divided we are weak, never give up we will keep fighting until our rights are fully restored.
Reply to this Comment | Report This