By Boyce Watkins, PhD on Dec 30th 2010 1:29PM
Jamie and Gladys Scott have sat behind bars for nearly two decades over a robbery that netted just $11 dollars. The two women also dispute the fact that they even participated in the robbery, and many wondered if there were political motivations behind the magnitude of their original sentence. But the Scott sisters, who are 36 and 38 years old, were released this week when Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour suspended their sentences indefinitely.
The sisters were given two life sentences in 1994 when they allegedly ambushed a man, hitting him in the head with a shot gun and making off with $11 dollars. Nancy Lockhart, an activist, fought tirelessly for the women to be released, and there were rallies held in Mississippi on their behalf. She was finally successful when the governor made the decision to release them.
One interesting aspect of the release conditions for the Scott sisters is that they are actually required to share a kidney or will be asked to come back to prison. While bizarre as a request, this doesn't seem to be a problem, given that Gladys offered to share her kidney with her sister. Governor Barbour cited the high cost to the state of Jamie's kidney condition (she has complete kidney failure), and also noted that he doesn't feel that the sisters are a threat to public safety.
http://xml.channel.aol.com/xmlpublisher/fetch.v2.xml?option=expand_relative_urls&dataUrlNodes=uiConfig,feedConfig,entry&id=969154&pid=969153&uts=1293736157
http://cdn.channel.aol.com/cs_feed_v1_6/csfeedwrapper.swf
Exonerated by DNA
Byron Halsey
Halsey spent more than two decades in state prison before being exonerated by DNA testing for the brutal rape and murder of two New Jersey children. Now he's filing
a federal civil rights suit.
AP / The Star-Ledger
AP
BlackVoices.com
Exonerated by DNA
Byron Halsey
Halsey spent more than two decades in state prison before being exonerated by DNA testing for the brutal rape and murder of two New Jersey children. Now he's filing a federal civil rights suit.
Exonerated by DNA
Alton Logan
Logan spent 26 years in prison for fatally shooting a security guard in 1983. In 2007, an attorney for another man who admitted that he had committed the crime came forward with the truth. He was officially declared innocent in April 2009.
Exonerated by DNA
Antonio Beaver
He served more than a decade in prison because blood found on an attack victim was not presented in his trial. Once testing proved him not guilty, all charges were dropped in 2007. Unfortunately, he landed back in jailafter crashing his car while drunk.
Exonerated by DNA
Calvin Johnson
DNA from a rape kit did not match Johnson's. He was set free in 1999 after nearly 16 years in prison. He later wrote a book about his ordeal.
Exonerated by DNA
Darryl Hunt
Darryl Hunt was convicted twice of a 1984 North Carolina murder. After DNA results proved his innocence in 1994, it still took 10 years of legal appeals to exonerate him.
Exonerated by DNA
Donte Booker
After serving 15 years on a rape conviction, Booker was exonerated on Feb. 9, 2005, after DNA evidence on the victim's clothing pointed to someone else. In 2007 he was accused of a second rape, of which he was found not guilty by a jury in 2008.
Exonerated by DNA
Floyd Brown
Brown was freed in 2007 after 14 years behind bars. Authorities locked up the mentally disabled man without a trial in 1993 and lost or destroyed key criminal evidence that could have freed him years ago.
Exonerated by DNA
Herman Atkins
Atkins was convicted in 1988 of robbery, rape, forcible oral copulation and for using a handgun. After test results were returned, Atkins was released from prison in February 2000, after spending 12 years in prison. He has since gone to college, married, and dedicated his life to helping those who have been wrongly convicted.
Exonerated by DNA
James Lee Woodard
Woodard spent more time in prison than any other wrongfully convicted inmate in U.S. history -- 27 years. DNA testing in the murder and rape of his girlfriend ultimately overturned his conviction in 2008.
Exonerated by DNA
James Waller
In 2006, 23 years after his conviction of rape, DNA from a rape kit that had never been presented was found not to belong to Waller. He was pardoned by Texas governor Rick Perry in 2007.
Exonerated by DNA
The same way that politics may have played a role in the sentencing of the Scott sisters (Nancy shared much of this with me last year), politics also plays a role in their release. Governor Haley Barbour has an interest in running for president in 2012 and has been heavily criticized for a
series of very public racial embarrassments. I suspect that his decision to release the Scott sisters is an attempt to try to make things right with African Americans. Unfortunately for Haley Barbour, his consistent and unprofessional attacks on the nation's first black president have already ruined the presidential prospects of the governor of arguably the most historically racist state in America.
We should all celebrate the release of the Scott sisters, and I am personally very happy for them. But one thing that also holds true is that there are hundreds of thousands of prison inmates across America who've received sentences that are clearly out of proportion with the magnitude of their crimes. Also, justice systems like that in the state of Mississippi are guilty of continuing the slave trade by incarcerating tens of thousands of people (a large percentage of whom happen to be black and brown) and forcing them to do work for which they are either unpaid or poorly compensated. The release of the Scott sisters is but one symbolic victory in a very long "to do list" for the entire criminal justice system. NAACP President Ben Jealous was good to provide a comment on the matter for the New York Times, and it is my hope that he will pick up the torch to help inspire Attorney General Eric Holder to push his staff to investigate the nature of this system of modern day slavery.
The state of
the criminal justice system is not in debate by African American leadership. (Everyone knows it is a modern day holocaust of unthinkable magnitude.) The only question, at this point, is who will have the courage to confront it. I hope that those who fought for Jamie and Gladys will continue to fight for everyone. I also hope that the NAACP will confront the justice system in its entirety, for it is truly a life-or-death issue for millions in the African American community. Our children need us to be strong, focused, determined and uncompromising on this issue, for their futures depend on what we do.
Dr. Boyce Watkins is the founder of the Your Black World Coalition and a co-founder of the Never Going Back initiative to reform the criminal justice system. To have Dr. Boyce commentary delivered to your email, please click here.
Comments: (45)
Add a comment
By: LB on 12/31/2010 5:06PM
It is good that they are getting out of jail because the crime did not fit the time. Yet, I am concerned. How can a politician put such a requirement on the freedom of these two young ladies? Did he know already that they are a match for kidney transplant? The reasoning that it cost too much to continue paying for the dialysis treatments makes no since, because they have obviously never worked, have no income, no insurance, so how is this procedure going to happen? If they stay in Mississippi, won't they have to get some assistance? If I were the Scott's, I would sue the state of Mississippi for the years they had to stay incarcerated even after the men they were with were released and require the state to pay all hospital bills associated with the kidney transplant and secure adequate housing for both of them. What is next? Why not require everyone who serves time in jail to donate an organ as a condition of their release. God knows there are plenty of people on the organ donor waiting list!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: corey on 12/31/2010 5:34PM
Regardless, of how much money the women took, the bottom line is they COMMITTED A CRIME. They robbed a man and assaulted him with a gun.
Is it known if these women had any prior criminal history? If so, maybe that is the reason they received such a heafty sentence.
I am glad they are being released, maybe they can share there story with others who are headed in the same direction as they were already in.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: hc040350 on 12/31/2010 6:16PM
for all the people that thing it was fair for the woman to do so long a time in prison how would you feel if it was your sisters or childress
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: johnny on 12/31/2010 8:20PM
By: hc040350 on 12/31/2010 6:16PMNeutral for all the people that thing it was fair for the woman to do so long a time in prison how would you feel if it was your sisters or childress
"this is America, there are many men going to jail and prison who are innocent of DV everyday, because they fought back in self-defense to protect themselves from harm, so I don't care no cent about these women who were guilty of strong arm robbery with a shotgun.[these innocent men could have been your father, brother, uncle, etc. so please stop using that sister, mother, etc. crap--if you can use it in situations where men are victimized.
Report This
By: MELISSA on 12/31/2010 9:42PM
There are people of all colors in Americas prisons that have been wrongly convicted. Lets put all their faces in the news, not just one color. The whole justice system needs a long over due make over. These women should have spent time behind bars due to the nature of their crime, but I do agree that a life sentence is a little extreme. I am however tired of everything being a race issue.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Fooxe on 12/31/2010 10:55PM
Johnny no offense I know they did wrong and they deserve to do some time, but there are child molesters and rapist who get less time this, when will he justice system recognize and make the punishment fit the crime?
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: john on 1/01/2011 2:20AM
When the legal system starts treating men as equals to women in domestic violence and sexual offenses, will be the first sign that our legal system has repaired itself of its deep seated corruption.
Report This
By: rosa lee on 1/01/2011 12:49AM
THEY DID THE CRIME TRUE BUT WAS TO LONG OF A TIME THAT THEY GAVE THEM
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: guitar queen on 1/01/2011 1:58AM
yes. thease ladies desrved their punishment. who wants to be robbed. andbeaten even killed for a few dollars or many dollars. ibelieve thease women was crack heads. you don't take other peoples stuff are their lives for what are rightfuly theirs.you better watch out they might do it again.you never know i hope they never hurt or kill any one again the $11 dollars was not theirs to take. i feel sorry about her kidney failure my sister and husband died with it. i rejoice she's getting another chance at life may god be with them both and us all
happy new year
love/peace
guitar queen
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: ALBERT on 1/03/2011 3:15PM
While it is true that this country has made a great stride towards civility and equality the justice system is still ridden with 1800s approaches to handling administration. This is what I mean what a fair system take a celebrity (Lindsay Lohan) to Rehab so many times without her serving a jail term and yet a man on the street arrested for an equal or lesser crime(read the Scott sisters) is made to serve for life. Their conditions of release is even more ridiculous- that she have to give her sister a kidney and she got to take it to earn their freedoms. Something is seriously wrong somewhere. I came to this country from Africa but even by our standards it appear bizzare.
Reply to this Comment | Report This