By Alexis Stodghill on Jan 28th 2011 12:35PM
Filed under: News, The Economy

This is the face of the extreme budget cuts taking place nation wide in our fire departments, our school systems and our public health facilities. Renee Muhammad, pictured here, used to be a fire fighter in Camden, New Jersey before she had to turn in her gear recently, emotionally surrendering a career in which she undoubtedly saved many lives. Muhammad is one less person in Camden who will be on the ground should an emergency arise. She is also one less person who will be paying into the tax base that supports her community. As a country, we had better be prepared to lose more people in public service like her in the name of the popular call for government budget cuts that is sweeping the nation, with the new Obama budget cuts poised to be enacted.
We have a lot to lose if cutting government budgets leads to higher unemployment, even worse public schools, and
endangered public safety. Unemployment has led to the inevitable defunding of the tax base. That cannot be denied. The public sector cuts that have already taken place as a result have sharply harmed our quality of life. Is there any question that New York City's poor response to December's storms,
which caused avoidable deaths, was caused by this attempt at saving money? Tragic loss is the trap at the end of a road paved with public sector budget cuts. The proposed
Obama budget cuts are just a first step in that direction.
An economic "solution" like this cries out for a life-sustaining alternative.
The Guardian UK has outlined an obvious fix to the situation we are facing. Raising taxes on businesses and the richest Americans by 10-15% would create enough revenue to reduce the deficit and balance budgets without hurting economic growth, or human beings. Even
Reagan himself raised taxes and saw the economy grow. Women like Renee Muhammad could keep her job, paying desperately needed taxes into the system while keeping us safe. The wealthy and the business community would also be able to rely on solid services even they need like fully-funded police. So why are our leaders
(and many citizens) obsessed with slashing monies for essential services? Because of a recurrent lie being told.
And we in particular can't fall for the
lie that cutting taxes for the rich will help the economy. As African Americans, a larger portion of our community is
employed in the public sector compared to the general population. Many of our elders and others in vulnerable positions are reliant on the kinds of programs whose spending leaders are planning to cut or freeze. If America has a lot to lose through
austerity programs, black America will lose a whole hell of a lot. The
black unemployment rate is already twice that of the general population. We just can't take anymore willful economic destruction.
http://xml.channel.aol.com/xmlpublisher/fetch.v2.xml?option=expand_relative_urls&dataUrlNodes=uiConfig,feedConfig,entry&id=977571&pid=977570&uts=1296242504
http://cdn.channel.aol.com/cs_feed_v1_6/csfeedwrapper.swf
Handling a Lay Off Professionally
As layoffs continue nationwide, it's important to make a plan for how you want to leave your present job should the ax fall your way. Here are some do's and don'ts. Feel free to add more suggestions in the comments section below.
Getty Images / AP(3)
AP
BlackVoices.com
Handling a Lay Off Professionally
As layoffs continue nationwide, it's important to make a plan for how you want to leave your present job should the ax fall your way. Here are some do's and don'ts. Feel free to add more suggestions in the comments section below.
Handling a Lay Off Professionally
DON'T: Get on your computer and send angry, bitter emails. Keep your last emails poised and professional. Use this time to send out your contact information, and ask others to keep in touch.
Handling a Lay Off Professionally
DON'T: Talk negatively about the work place you are leaving to your replacement, should you by chance come into contact with them. This person could be a potential reference for you in the future.
Handling a Lay Off Professionally
DO: Control your mouth and your emotions. Resist the impulse to tell off your boss or former co-workers. Don't whine or complain. Stay calm, cool and collected. A poised exterior can help you collect valuable references from your former colleagues, which can help you land another gig.
Handling a Lay Off Professionally
DON'T: Badmouth your previous employer to a prospective employer. Even if your accusations are true, these negative words will only reflect badly on you -- not good if you are looking for a new job.
Handling a Lay Off Professionally
DON'T: Steal supplies, equipment, information or anything else from your former employer. This could be seen as a criminal act, and land you in legal trouble at the very worst. In addition, it will tarnish your reputation, your self-image and do nothing to get your job back.
Handling a Lay Off Professionally
DO: Develop a sunny persona with which to make your exit -- and seek new opportunities. The great thing about leaving a position is the chance to reinvent yourself, no matter what the circumstances. Stand up straight, smile, believe in yourself and stay positive. See yourself as the winner that you are, and maintain your self-esteem.
Handling a Lay Off Professionally
DO: Ask for references before you go, especially if your dismissal was not based on performance. Be sure to get permission from your former superiors and co-workers in case you may need future potential employers to contact them.
Handling a Lay Off Professionally
If we don't demand that our local and federal officials stop draining public budgets and raise taxes on the rich instead, they will never do it. And we will be the ones who suffer in the end when public sector jobs and social services disintegrate to the point that the basic security we enjoy as American citizens today becomes a luxury.
What do you think we should do? Should America just tighten its belt even further and take the risk that even without a strong public sector our social fabric will remain intact? Or do we demand that our government
tax the rich -- who can afford it?
I have a feeling that the founding fathers would be on our side.
Leave your comments below!
Comments: (27)
Add a comment
By: Poetrysez on 1/28/2011 3:22PM
TAX them!!!!! Make them buy no frills brands like the rest of us. Instead of Skippy buy the store brand. Tax them and don't lose any sleep over it because they'll find a way to get that green back ;)
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: vdog on 2/04/2011 9:05AM
This is all the result of the WORKING CLASS MAN backing the causes of the RICH MAN since REAGAN.
Report This
By: The Cynic on 1/30/2011 3:15AM
Didn't Obama already cut their taxes for the next two years? Is their away he can get over what he has already done? Especially with a Republican majority in the House?
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Macaroni on 1/28/2011 8:45PM
I can speak with conviction about my own region only but news reports, if they can be trusted, indicate a problem that is systemic across the nation. Lay-offs are mandated because public service employees (police, firefighters, teachers et al) refuse to accept pay freezes (not cuts mind you, FREEZES) that would enable taxpayers to maintain current workforce levels. Whenever union members vote on either temporarily denying themselves a pay raise or cutting the legs out from under their "brothers" they, at least in my area, unhesitatingly have chosen the latter. These greedy, self-serving pigs all claim to have the best interests of the citizenry in miund but nothing could be further from the truth. They can retire in their 50's on 80% of the average of their last 3 highest yearly salaries, get Cadillac health plans (some at no cost) forever and COLA. Their avarice, as extensively chronicled by economists and financial analysts for many months now, may actually be so severe it may end up bankrupting entire STATES! Don't cry for the insatiable slobs who end up in the unemployment line - their union brethren who sent them there surely aren't.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Mrs. JK on 1/30/2011 6:12AM
I would have to agree with you, but not so harshly. I was raised on my father's GM salary. I remember him complaining about the higher seniority taking a voluntary layoff with at least 90% of pay and full benefits. But... on the other side of that coin, why should public workers lose their jobs when the rich are living way beyond their means, just watch some of these reality shows.
Report This
By: macaroni on 1/28/2011 8:49PM
That, of course, is "mind" not "miund." Forgive my
spelling - concentrating on this passionate issue
makes me lose concentration on my typing...
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: rh1994 on 1/29/2011 6:54AM
It's time the churches started paying taxes too. Churches are big business now, preachers wearing rolex & driveing caddalics
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: ROD on 1/29/2011 8:34AM
WHY ARE YOU CALLING IT OBAMA'S TAX CUTS WHEN IN FACT IT THE REPUBLICANS THAT WOULD NOT LET HIM TAX THE RICH INSTEAD. THIS IS THE REPUBLICAN RICH KIDS TAX ALTERNATIVE GOING INTO EFFECT. CALL IT WHAT IT IS.............
DR ROD
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Theresa on 1/29/2011 7:34PM
Thank you for clarifying that he knows damn well its the republicans and not Obama.
Report This
By: G.E.N. on 1/29/2011 11:17AM
Tax the rich, all they're going to spend their money on is the newest model Lamborghini or Bentley toy car, an entire new wardroabe for the season and take long vcations, anywahere they want on the money they're business earned all the while government/state/municipal/county employees save for 2yrs or more for a cheap 2wk vacation for their families on a Carnicval cruise ship or to an Amusement park for a week. while living on a salary that doesn't get fair raises they deserve because the agency they work for has to function os a shoe string budget.
Reply to this Comment | Report This