President Obama Defends His Austere Budget Proposal: No More 'Running Up the Credit Card'

Comments (3)

President Obama Defends His Austere Budget Proposal

After a flood of criticism, President Obama held a press conference on Tuesday during which he defended his new budget proposal. After approving tax breaks for the rich late last year as part of a deal with Republicans that allowed the president to extend unemployment benefits, many see the austere measures in Obama's budget proposal as unfair to the poor. The president defended his budget, which contains many cuts affecting the needy, stating confidently that his plan realistically address our current economic problems. The New York Times reports:

The president said his budget, the third of his presidency, reflects a new and changed reality in the country's economic situation and allows for a greater focus on spending cuts and attention to the deficit.

"The economy is now growing again. People are now hopeful again," Mr. Obama said, speaking at his first news conference of the year. "In that environment, now that we are out of the depths of the crisis, we have to look at these long-term problems and these medium-term problems." [...]


On the budget proposal, which he released on Monday, Mr. Obama compared the cuts he has proposed to the kind of belt-tightening that many families have had to make during the economic downturn.

"We're not going to be running up the credit card any more. That's important and that's hard to do," the president said. "I recognize that there are going to be plenty of arguments in the months to come and everybody is going to have to give a little bit."

Asked about cuts to some of the programs that Democrats care deeply about, Mr. Obama acknowledged frustration with the number of Americans who are still suffering economically. He also mentioned that he had received many letters from people who are struggling.

But he said that his ability to help the country recover economically over the long term will do more to help those individuals.

"My job is to make sure we're focused over the long term. Where do we need to go?" Mr. Obama said.


While it's great that President Obama is thinking long term -- which is clearly what leaders were not doing when they allowed lack of oversight to fuel the sub-prime mortgage crisis -- it is curious that the targets of his attempts at saving money are society's weakest. The president just signed off on a bill that extended the Bush-era tax cuts, which Democratic Representative Jim McDermott called "a huge giveaway to the super-rich in these tough economic times" (Bloomberg Businessweek). At the same time, Obama's budget cuts call for:

1. The impoverished to contribute more for basic heating and cooling needs in extreme weather,
2. Cuts to education spending (which is already on the rocks),
3. Making already bootstrapped community service organizations look for economic support elsewhere, and
4. Literally taking food from the mouths of babies through slashing funding for anti-hunger organizations.

Is that really intelligent long-term thinking?


I wonder if Obama has considered what will happen when the poorest of the poor become desperate for adequate food and quality education. What will be the end result if millions freeze in winters to come, or expire due to unbearable summer heat? How safe will our society feel overall if the disenfranchised chafe under the increasing frustrations of their position, as the social services that used to tend to their needs slowly dissolve to be replaced by cold austerity?

Very recently, British paper The Guardian UK outlined that by raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans and businesses by just 10-15%, we could balance the budget without resorting to these life-destroying proposals. The readers of Black Voices voted that this is the best way to deal with our economic situation, with 76% agreeing that taxing the rich is preferable to cutting basic human services. Plus, this is a sentiment reflected on other leading sites. But instead of enacting this simple measure, the president has delivered greater tax breaks to the rich, at the cost of harming the people in society who need economic support the most.

President Obama: This is not the change we believed you would bring. These cuts will only create a more harsh economic environment for millions in the short term, leading people to go to desperate extremes, or sink into a spiritual depression that could harm our culture permanently. When people are financially desperate, they either resort to crime or riot. Could preserving tax breaks for the wealthy to slash support for the poor be worth these violent extremes?

In the long-term, if this budget is passed, we will just have to wait and see if this belt-tightening will be worth the erosion of equal opportunity and faith in a fair society.

Related: Obama's wackiest budget cuts (CNN Money)

Comments: (3)

Add a comment

Page 1 of 1

Add a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed but they are required to confirm your comments. When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password."

Most Commented Articles

Daily Drama

The Best Clips From TV's Hottest Shows


More Daily Drama >>

Find a Message Board

Discover conversations on everyone from Barack to Beyonce. There are nearly 50 forums, so click on a category below and find the right one for you.