
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act disallows employers to discriminate against applicants on criteria that relates to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. You can now add another item to the list: discrimination based on whether or not you already have a job.
An unknown but growing problem is employer discrimination against those who've been out of work for a very long time. Increasingly, companies are putting out ads for jobs that require that the applicant be "currently employed." This makes it more difficult for those who've been seeking work for long periods of time to have a chance to find a job.
The legislation designed to remedy this problem is referred to as The Fair Employment Act of 2011 (H.R. 1113), which was drafted by Rep. Hank Johnson (D.- GA) and co-sponsored by Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. (D. - Ill). The legislation effectively amends the Civil Rights Act, making it illegal for employers to refuse to hire or give lower compensation to people because of their employment status.
"I just thought about how unfair that was, to discriminate against people who had lost their jobs due to no fault of their own, who were just victims of corporate downsizing during a tough economy," Johnson told HuffPost. "And then to be penalized for having that status is very unfair. It reminded me of the days when blacks were told to not apply for jobs, when job ads said 'No women allowed.' This really affected me, and I decided that there was something that we could do."
The bill, if it passes, would put the burden onto the plaintiff to prove that discrimination ever took place. Unfortunately, it can be difficult to prove that discrimination occurred, at least the way the courts have been structured over the last decade. But legislators argue that having the law on the books will at least stem back blatant discrimination with ads requesting that the applicant already be employed.
This bill is like much of everything else that the American public sees coming out of Washington: modestly helpful, but not very meaningful. Many people of color across America are victims of various forms of discrimination, racial and otherwise. Unfortunately, they often find that their needs and issues are ignored by political leaders who are trapped by the status quo in a historically racist society. Even departments and organizations that haven't hired more than one black person in over a decade are let off the hook, as many are allowed to simply conclude that black people just aren't qualified.
We can at least say that this legislation is better than nothing, and it is our greatest hope that conscientious legislators like Jesse Jackson Jr. will continue to carry the torch in Washington.
Dr. Boyce Watkins is the founder of the Your Black World Coalition. To have Dr. Boyce commentary delivered to your e-mail, please click here. To follow Dr. Boyce on Facebook, please click here. 
Comments: (34)
Add a comment
By: estepld on 3/19/2011 7:23PM
i agree with that, only time some white need us is a 911.thank you someone think like me, maybe black will read more about whats going on in their country.
Report This
By: M. Alxander on 3/18/2011 8:01AM
There's not too many Blacks in this country who haven't been discriminated against and some of them held jobs !
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Dee Johnson on 3/18/2011 8:24AM
I am a legal secretary and have been unemployed for a year. I went on an interview in NY and the interviewer (age in her 60's) said to me “in all my career I have only been out of work for 3 months”, and then went on to say, “I guess it will take you about 5 to 6 weeks to get up to speed, since you have not worked in a while”. I was shock. Well you know I didn’t get the position, and we both know why.
A reputable agency told me that firms or companies who advertise through Careerbuilder or Monster.com do not want to hire unemployed and only want candidates who are currently working. He said try to rely on friends, co-workers, etc. to get a position.
I hope this bill pass sooner than later.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Liz on 3/18/2011 8:44AM
I cannot believe you were able to hire anyone, you cannot spell, and you are ileterate. Sentences begin with a capital letter, fool. The letter Q is always followed with a u. Dumb Azz.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Liz on 3/18/2011 8:45AM
By the way, that comment was for the toothless, back woods, billW.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: mr-stephen1 on 3/18/2011 9:44AM
Really! then how come so many workers are out of work and have be mistreated (rank discrimination on their jobs before being discharge, and the powere at be. Did not come to their assistance to fight and keep their jobs. This is why some people go back and ..........................
Please read and take a stand!
By: mr-stephen1 on 3/02/2011 11:42AMNeutral Wow, I have been writing and taking on the system since 20007 about these issues in Philadlphia, Pa and it Capital, so where is my media coverage?
Where is the NAACP, radio, TV, News, talk show host and other. when it comes to the little people loosing their job and before loosing that job are treated unfairly, disrespected and who seek to get justice by the union, Human relation, EEOC, and the justice system be trade them become they are not a known figure in society. I have written the President and the Attorney General about my case, but those work under them probably feel its not important enough to pass the information on to them. Because as of this very day after several letters certified. I have yet to receive a communication back, so I guess you have to be someone of important! (wow I though I was( A vet, ) can I get a call! for some assistance with my issue. Please read the following letter!
US-Veteran Mr. Stephen. L
E-mail- Ilovebopping@aol.com
To President Obama The Commander & chief of the United State&
The Attorney General Of The United State,
Honorable Mr. Eric Holder
I have filed a law suite against all parties involved in my case employment discrimination and
mistreatment, The Delaware County Office Serving The Aging, Human Relation, Pennsylvania EEOC, and The Civil Service Commission, and International Brotherhood Teamsters Local Union 115, and must add Judge Baylson, Michael and the Pennsylvania state attorney Tom Corbett, and feel I might have to add more names. As this case goes on for added discrimination
,and farther unfair treatment because I am not a Lawyer.
I would like to bring the following situation to your attention. I find my civil rights being violated by
the following Judge Baylson, who constantly denials all of my request of important document to help
my case. A lawyer for the defendants Matthew J Connell of media Penn and the other defendants that
were dismissed by the judge. I have been fighting against work place injustice sine 2007 on my own
and was granted permission to represent myself by the US District court Judge Baylson. I have written
your office over the years, and sent letters and e-mails to the president as well about this matters,
and the degree of disrespect I get from all parties involved. I am being harassment by all parties who
have yet to give me any things I have requested pertaining to my case or any request I have made
under the freedom act of information.
Those defendants are located on the following pages located to the left of the legal form. Who have
all denailed me a right to a fair trail and witnesses to support my accusation, and the rights to
examining any evident agaist me.
Here are my issues!
1a). Pro se parties are expected to adhere to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and
the Local Rules of Civil Procedure and to file all of their pleadings with the Clerk of the Court, rather than directly with chambers. This is one of the judge’s rules, so why did I have to turn my paper work over to the opposing party @ their office?
1b) 7) Right to a Fair Trial , so where are my rights especially my civil rights that has been violated by the judge, the attorney general of the state of Pennsylvania, and the other defendants
(Every person has the right to a fair trial both in civil and in criminal cases, and the effective protection of all human rights very much depends on the practical availability at all times of access to competent, independent and impartial courts of law which can, and will, administer justice fairly.)
1c) TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 21 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 1981
Prev | Next
§ 1981. Equal rights under the law
How Current is This?
(a) Statement of equal rights
All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other.
(b) “Make and enforce contracts” defined
For purposes of this section, the term “make and enforce contracts” includes the making, performance, modification, and termination of contracts, and the enjoyment of all benefits, (privileges,) terms, and conditions of the contractual relationship. (The word privileges means that you are entitled to everything another person gets, so the question here is ” Why wasn’t I granted permission to subpoena key state witnesses or even get important document from these witnesses. Since I am acting as my own lawyer so where is the due process? )
(c) Protection against impairment
The rights protected by this section are protected against impairment by nongovernmental discrimination and impairment under color of State law.
(The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution limit the power of the federal and state governments to discriminate. The Fifth amendment has an explicit requirement that the federal government not deprive individuals of "life, liberty, or property," without due process of the law. See U.S. Const. amend. V. It also contains an implicit guarantee that each person receive equal protection of the laws. (The Fourteenth Amendment explicitly prohibits states from violating an individual's rights to due process and equal protection). See U.S. Const. amend. XIV. In the employment context, the right of equal protection limits the power of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their employment practices by treating employees, former employees, or job applicants unequally because of membership in a group (such as a race or sex). Due process protection requires that employees receive a fair process before the termination if the termination relates to a "liberty" (such as the right to free speech) or property interest. State constitutions may also afford protection from employment discrimination. )
The Constitution does not directly constrain discrimination in the private sector, but the private sector has become subject to a growing body of federal and state statutes.
1C) I partition the court to subpoena key state workers to court to testified about
their statements and actions, and was denied access to these people by the judge Baylson.
Who seemed to be protecting these state workers as well as the union.
2) Judge Baylson, dismissed my case without doing any checks and balances. Which resorted in giving
the major defendants the opportunity to have my case dismissed against them, but he had to reopening
the case. However the majority state defendants and the union were still granted permission for
dismissal because a mistake made on the court’s behalf.
3) I sent a letter to the judge under the freedom act of information for the defendants to appearance in
the court room and to make key documents available to me and was denied by the judge again.
4) I am now compelled to take my documents to the opposing lawyer, but yet when I request
something from the court I am denied, and the following statement continue to appear on my letter
from the court or judge “ I need to learn civil proceeding ,but yet he gave me permission to represent
myself, so why can’t I have all the privileges and resources a lawyer has to defend myself?
5) The last letter I received instruct me to take my document to the opposing lawyer office and give
them to them. However, I have informed the opposing lawyer and reminded the judge. Thoses
documents are in the court’s possession and available to all. Yet I continue to be harassed by both the
judge and the lawyer, and all of my request have been denied , and all the privileges a lawyer has have
not been extended to me acting as my own lawyer grant by the court to do so. I can’t see being forced
to go to the opposing lawyer’s office equal grounds of justice. I find it to be a disadvantage for me.
6) As of 3/10 I have learned that my case has been dismissed, so therefore I would like to bring charges
Against Judge Baylson for discrimination, unfair treatment, denialing my requests, and honoring a
freedom of information request, as well as playing sides and adding more stress. Ordering me to take
my documents to opposing defends lawyer ’s office. When the documents are available in the court
House.
I am asking for a congressional investigation into the violations of my civil rights to protect my rights
and myself. I have a right to have access to all available documents established by the defendants for
my review. To prepare myself for court and copies made available as well.
I have a right to have all involved in this case subpoena to court to prove my points, and to expose
the wrong doing at my last place of employment. To include all the errors the defendants have made.
I also would like my case to be heard by another judge. Who is going to be fair with the justice and
review all documents made available to them. Before favoring the other part because they have the
degree in law compared to my social worker degree.
I have read! When there are in fractions establish in a case and proof can be provided. A plaintiff
Can ask or have their case moved to the supreme court. To be heard by another judge according to
Their legal manuals, so please investigate as soon as possible. I need a judge who is going to stand up
For what’s right and not become apart of the other side. Because they are the state and I am just a
Veteran . Who tried to go back in the civilian work force , so the question is who here to protect my
rights?
When I have been protecting their and still have all the means and skills to continue to protect
American rights.
The following are emails and letters I have sent before this letter. My case number 08-4182, at the
United State District Court For The Eastern District Of Pennsylvania, for I am very tired of being play
with by people who think I do know anything.
Please read the following documents and investigate how this judge handled my case!
I would like to bring federal charge against all involved in my case and their associates for discrimination, unfair treatement, violation of my civil rights, withholding evidenets, ignoring my request, protecting felonies or their buddies, causing long term stress, and violating state, county, and federal rules that protects all american especially military veteran, and to conduct a proper investigation, and doing their jobs in the rightful manner
Sign Veteran Mr. Stephen
CC-President and other veterans organizations and others!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Speaking Out on 5/31/2011 10:01AM
Mr.-Stephen1 I have read some of your comments/issues regarding your case. As a semi-retired, former legal assistant/paralegal of 28 years, I am passing along the following information. You can go to a local library that has a law section, or a university law school and ask permission from one of the desk people (in a law school they are usually law students) for a copy of the local Rules of Civil Procedure. This book is what the Judge is referring to. All lawyers have to follow these rules, and so do persons who decide to represent themselves in a court of jurisdiction. The Rules of Civil Procedure cover all complaints, service, pleadings, motions, discovery, statutes of limitations you need if you continue to represent yourself. I hope this helps you. One thing I would like to mention, it is not advisable to upset a Judge. He is like a "god" in his court room. He has the right to ask that you education yourself and present yourself properly in his courtroom. Not following his orders to educate yourself in Civil Procedure will only make matters worse. I am sorry for your flustration, and perhaps you were not given proper advice from friends who suggested you pursue on your own, but unless you start over and show the Judge that you are competent to represent yourself, further efforts on your part will prove to be fruitless.
I end by saying that discrimination isn't all against one specific race. I am white, older, and have experienced discrimination based on my age. I also know of others, like me, that are in the same situation. If you have other questions about handling your case and I can provide some insight, please let me know. Good luck
Report This
By: mr-stephen1 on 3/21/2011 8:40AM
You need to add rank discrimination! Supervisors, management and people higher up the chai of command making your da a live hell becuse you are not part of the good old boy/girl net work. You know what i am talking about just read the follwing and see if you fit in!
Vet Mr. Stephen,
Phila, Pa
E-mail- ilovebopping@aol.com
Work place injustice !
Have u/experience these things on your job?
Here is a topic to discuss on your show because lots of people are going through this daily.
0) Please sign the following paper work! Which state we terminate you at any given time and u/will have no recourse, and can leave on your own. Wow no more worker’s rights
1) Have you lost your job lately?
2) How did management personnel treat you in the earlier months before you were terminated?
3) Did you find yourself doing a lot of overtime without overtime pay just to get the job done?
4) Were you working in hostile work environment were ignorant supervisors and managers always had something smart to say about your work in a loud and humiliation way?
5) Has the following words ever been brought up @ your work place” Down Sizing& Prioritizing,” words that mean we are going to get rid of you by any means necessary, so we can cut cost and reduce client’s services!
6) Have you gone to different organization for help like Human Relation, and The EEOC, and find progress for employee’s justice? Being place on hold for years!
7) Have you talked with a lawyer and they referred you to the Human Relation, or the EEOC, or just gave you a lot of excuses not to take your case against your formal employer?
8) Have you had a civil service hearing and they refuse allow you to have your choosing witnesses, but had their on the side line?
I have heard all of the excuses have filed a 20 million dollar suite against my formal Job called the County Office Servicing The Aging, located in Eddy Stone, Pa, The State of Pennsylvania Civil Service Department and the so call union International Brotherhood who were supposed to protect its workers besides taking their money each month. Theses are people who hide behind the 11Th amendment and pleasing! Mistakes made by others in position of power!
I have contacted various political personnel as well and various lawyers about my matter, and have been given all kinds of excuses. Why they could not take my case.” To tedious, my case load is full, we can touch it until the EEOC, conduct their investigation, u/waited to long, I can touch it because it’s in the courts, political people excuses, “
I have even gone to the EEOC, who refused to put another co-worker case with mine. After we both told them to combine our cases to provide our point of view about discrimination gender, mistreatment being treated differently, age (older worker being discharge) disability, working in a hostile work environment, where the people above could not tell their bottom from their heads, and violating company policies.
Now, I have contacted my so call elective officials including the president of the United State. Well u/can read the responses for yourselves, and then wonder why people get postal’s man’s attitude because there is no real help out their for the hard working little people, but all of this is going to change soon, Look out for the phases down sizing, prioritizing.
Therefore, I am asking all who have lost their job to stand up against work place injustices because they work for us the tax payers and their work needs to scrutinize like the employee. When they make changes in the work place can’t fully explained or train the employee. Than those words: down sizing, and prioritizing need to be use against them.
I have no lawyer to represent me, so I am on my own like many of you, so I am asking all lost jobs, and mistreated jobless American and other to take a stand, and help each other. By organizing the biggest march against the State Capitals, and the Justice Department, for over looking! The way the employee has been treated by companies, local, state, federal, and private in the down sizing and prioritizing world of trail and error, and by any means necessary to get rid of people.
I am calling upon all to take a stand and not take the postal man’s attitude for our justice. I had a court date in June of this year and it was joke. They showed very little respect for me in the US court because I represent myself, but I am a veteran. Therefore, I have a lots of work to do on my own like you, so if you are interested in taking a stand against work place in Justice and non-union representation, and those organizations who says they represent the people. e-mail me @ilovebopping@aol.com direct and put work place injustice.
They got seven billion and we got discharged with no bennies or Justice! It time for the American people to stand up and march for worker’s rights and justice! Send your letter to Judge Baylson, US courts, 6th and Market ST, office of the clerk, Philadelphia, Pa. 19106-1797 and let him know about your work’s place injustice and how no one is protecting your rights.
My case number is-08-4182
As of today my case has been dismissed because the judge refuse to honor any of my request, but did so for the other parties. I filed against, so where is the real justice when everybody with power are protecting each other?
E-mail me @ ilovebopping@aol.com
Sign Vet: Mr. Stephen,
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Eris on 3/18/2011 11:15AM
Not all black people steal, BillW. White people are the biggest criminals, but I guess that white collar crime is okay. Keep firing people, I hope someone comes back and retaliate, just because you're a racists. I bet you won't be making those types of comments once someone comes and bust a cap in your white a$$. Don't think they won't come back just because they haven't come back yet.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: johnny on 3/18/2011 11:31AM
A great change in law. Finally, a just law is passed in this country that is gender-neutral which is pro-civil and equal rights.
Reply to this Comment | Report This